Welcome to Brief Encounters: Law School & Beyond, a podcast by Project LLM. The series explores journeys of Indian professionals who have pursued legal education abroad. The goal is to bring out stories, experiences, and practical advice to inspire and guide others considering an overseas legal education.
Today our guest is Ms. Shreya Nair, a dynamic and multifaceted lawyer with a passion for mentorship, research, and advocacy.
Her journey spans a diverse array of experiences, including earning an LL.M. in International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution from the National University of Singapore and completing her LL.B. from DSNLU. Ms. Nair’s accomplishments are equally impressive, ranging from coaching successful moot teams to publishing thought-provoking articles on topics such as judicial intervention and space tourism.
We’ll explore her experiences navigating a global legal career, her insights into the LL.M. application process, and her reflections on balancing a variety of legal interests.
What sparked your interest in law and what factors influenced your decision to pursue it as a career?
As noncommittal as this might sound, law wasn’t something that came to my mind right away. I have always been really into debating, public speaking, and all of that. Initially, my parents thought maybe journalism could be an option. I knew engineering wasn’t for me, even though I was a good student in school. Coming from a small city like Rewa in Madhya Pradesh, career decisions are often influenced by what everyone else is doing.
I managed to resist the Kota train (preparing for engineering entrances) and focused on figuring out what I truly wanted. After interacting with some of my batchmates and learning about their plans, law seemed like a great option. It aligned with my interests, was academically intensive, and I’ve always enjoyed being a student.
I gave CLAT, got into SNLU, and decided to give it a shot. At the time, SNLU had recently established a campus, and that impressed me. I was told, “You’ll be the big fish in a small pond,” which appealed to me.
Now that I’m in litigation and going to court, I’ve come to appreciate law in a deeper way. One of the things I love about the profession is seeing the immediate impact of my work. I think of it as similar to the medical profession, where doctors see instant results. In law, the social impact is profound—every judgment, every written word matters. That’s something that motivates me to be better, more articulate, and meticulous.
It wasn’t love at first sight, but over time, law became something I respect deeply and feel driven to excel in.
At DSNLU, you were actively involved in various committees, including the Internal Complaints Committee (Member), Recruitment Coordination Committee (Member), and the Centre for ADR (Convenor). Could you share the type of work these roles entailed and, in your opinion, the benefits law students can gain from engaging in such extracurricular activities?
I cannot underplay the role these committees have had in shaping me, especially during the later years of law school when I led many of them. Being part of these committees involved managing projects, coordinating with people, and taking ownership of tasks, which was a transformative experience.
My law school years spanned the Covid period, which made it crucial to connect with juniors, seniors, and graduates to understand what was happening in the industry and to keep juniors informed. I essentially became a bridge between what was going on in the legal field and the students who were navigating those uncertain times.
The Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) came into being due to an unfortunate incident, leading to its establishment through elections. Juniors reached out to me, noting the lack of female candidates participating, and encouraged me to take it up. Going through that process taught me a lot about how such structures function. It was a hands-on experience that gave me insights into policymaking, which directly translates to the work I do now in corporate policymaking. Understanding how things work at the ground level is vital, and being part of these committees made that possible.
Similarly, my involvement in the Recruitment Coordination Committee allowed me to gain a firsthand understanding of what companies look for when recruiting. This experience was incredibly valuable, as it prepared me to engage with the industry more effectively and gave me insights into the hiring process.
As for the Centre for ADR, arbitration was something I fell in love with during my second year. However, due to Covid, the ADR committee had become inactive. My batchmates and I took the initiative to rejuvenate it. We organized conferences, conducted internal events, and revived the ADR culture at DSNLU. I strongly believe every university should have an ADR committee; it’s become intrinsic to law education today.
Overall, being involved in these committees helped me understand the student cohort, the college’s image, and the role of student societies. These experiences have been invaluable, not only during my law school journey but also in my professional life. Engaging in such extracurricular activities is something I highly recommend to every law student.
You had identified your areas of interest in the second year itself. How did you identify this interest at such an early stage?
It all started towards the end of my second year when my university hosted its flagship event in Paris. I applied for it, got selected, and, along with one of my seniors, we were flown to Paris to attend. During this event, I had the opportunity to attend conferences, visit the ICC International Court of Arbitration, and interact with major law firms hosting events.
This exposure gave me a deeper understanding of commercial arbitration, institutional arbitration, and ad hoc arbitration. I was fascinated by how a procedure could be so widely regarded and why there was a sudden wave of interest in arbitration. I began reading about it and realized this was something I could truly see myself doing.
At the time, I was somewhat apprehensive about court litigation, so arbitration felt like a perfect fit. It did not involve frequent court appearances yet played a crucial role in commercial law. As my interest grew, I became relentless in pursuing anything related to arbitration. If I came across an opportunity with arbitration mentioned, I would apply for it without hesitation.
This experience not only sparked my interest but also became a significant part of my law school journey and profile. Arbitration has since remained a pivotal focus in my academic and professional pursuits.
How can students identify their areas of interest at an early stage? Any tips for that?
I think it’s important to start with the caveat that you don’t have to identify a niche early on. To be honest, the advice I often receive from my bosses is that while it’s great to have a niche, it’s equally important to be open to doing everything. Early on, taking on a variety of work helps you build a well-rounded understanding of the law, prevents monotony, and ensures you don’t approach every area of law the same way—because each has its nuances and requires a different perspective.
That said, if you feel drawn to a particular area, such as competition law or arbitration, I recommend reading extensively about it and connecting with people who are already established in that field. For me, having early exposure and mentorship made a significant difference. During my third year, for example, I was mentored by individuals in prominent arbitration positions, which allowed me to gain insights and develop my interest.
However, it’s important to approach this with balance. Arbitration, or any other niche, doesn’t exist in isolation—it interacts with and depends on other areas of law. So, while building expertise in a particular field, don’t sideline everything else. Broader knowledge enriches your specialization and ensures you’re prepared for the complexities of the legal ecosystem.
The process could involve reading extensively, talking to professionals in the field, and taking on opportunities that allow you to test your interest. Through this, you’ll begin to understand what resonates with you. Over time, you’ll realize if this is something you’re passionate about and want to pursue long-term. But don’t worry if you haven’t figured it out yet—you can’t possibly know everything, and the legal profession always has room for growth and discovery.
You were an active participant in moots and debates during college, achieving significant milestones such as being the ‘Runners-Up’ in the ‘H V Perera QC Memorial Moot’ (Victor’s Moot) and receiving an ‘Honorable Mention’ in the ‘Vis East Moot’. How did these experiences enhance your overall law school journey, and how important do you believe mooting is during undergraduate studies?
I think mooting is incredibly important. It helps you break barriers to understand if you’re good at researching, public speaking, or perhaps even both. Mooting is unique because it allows anyone to participate without initial filtering. Some moots may have a national-level selection, which can depend on luck, but opportunities like the Vis Moot, which is global in nature, let everyone join, giving participants an equal chance to experience something extraordinary.
Mooting also allows you to tap into resources that many global universities utilize. It teaches you how to research effectively, leverage tools like LinkedIn, and connect with mentors. For me, participating in the Vis Moot was transformative. Even though COVID prevented us from traveling, we submitted written submissions and received an award. The exposure to other universities, teams, and judges provided a huge morale boost. Engaging with judges who take the time to give personalized feedback was invaluable.
These experiences foster a sense of community. Mooting introduces you to people from across the world—Japan, China, Jordan, and beyond—building a well-connected global network. This community is extremely supportive, and you form connections with individuals who later become prominent figures in their fields.
For anyone considering arbitration or any specific area of law, I believe subject-specific moots like Vis, Price Media, or Stetson are fantastic opportunities. They help you determine whether a particular field aligns with your interests. Mooting is not just about winning or rankings—it’s about the journey. Even a team that ranks 85th at Vis would have had an enriching experience, met incredible people, and gained valuable feedback from coaches and judges.
In my own university, after our team’s success, some students were hesitant to participate because they doubted if they could achieve the same results. My advice to them—and anyone—is: don’t let the fear of results stop you. The experience of mooting itself is invaluable. Once you’re part of the moot community, you gain access to working groups, mentorship opportunities, and connections with peers and coaches, even from prestigious institutions like Harvard and NYU, who are incredibly open and supportive.
Mooting made me fall in love with arbitration, and the time spent researching and preparing reinforced my passion for the subject. So, for anyone hesitant—especially if you’re interested in areas like environmental law or arbitration—participate. The experience will help you discover just how much you enjoy the field and whether it’s right for you.
In addition to serving as a Moot Coach for your juniors, you were also a member of the Vis Moot Alumni Association’s Core Team for 2022-23. Could you share what these roles entailed, what drew you to them, and how significant you believe peer learning is in today’s context?
As soon as you participate in the Vis Moot, you become a part of the Vis Moot Alumni Association (VMAA). The association has a Core Team that organizes various programs, including the mentorship program, journal publications, diversity and inclusion events, and the Willem C. Vis Moot organization itself.
In 2022, I was a mentee in the mentorship program, where I had the incredible opportunity to be mentored by Mr. Kevin Nash, the Registrar of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC). He played a pivotal role in guiding me through my application processes and was always accessible for support. He even helped judge the moot rounds for juniors I was coaching. Through this experience, I understood the immense value of having a mentor in the industry.
Inspired by the mentorship I received, I wanted to give back. I applied to join the VMAA Core Team and became a part of their Mentor-Mentee Program team. My role involved reviewing applications, selecting mentees and mentors, and pairing them based on their experiences, geographical locations, expectations, and what each hoped to achieve from the program. Additionally, I hosted panel discussions for mentees and mentors on topics like studying abroad, working abroad, and exploring career opportunities in international arbitration.
This was an enriching experience during my academic year. While my studies were intense—especially with the Socratic method requiring daily preparation and coursework—this extracurricular activity provided a refreshing break. It allowed me to interact with people from across the globe who shared similar interests in arbitration.
These roles also helped me gain insights into how arbitration operates in different countries, what studying arbitration entails globally, and where I could explore future opportunities. Engaging in such initiatives wasn’t just about contributing; it was also about expanding my horizons and building a network of like-minded individuals. Peer learning, through these experiences, proved invaluable in broadening my perspective and sharpening my understanding of international arbitration.
Your internships span prestigious firms like J. Sagar Associates (JSA), Singh & Associates, Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) and others. Could you share insights into how these experiences shaped your understanding of law? Also, how did these experiences help you to narrow down your area of specialization?
I interned with MCIA towards the end of my second year, and that experience was pivotal in shaping my interest in arbitration. I worked directly under the Secretary General of MCIA, which allowed me to understand the operations of an arbitral institution in great detail. I realized how integral it is to connect with the global arbitration community. During my time there, I was involved in planning roadshows in Dubai and London, reaching out to firms in these jurisdictions. This exposure to international arbitration helped me understand how arbitration works on a global scale and reinforced my interest in pursuing an LL.M. in the field.
Simultaneously, I worked on analyzing Indian arbitration judgments, particularly in light of the 2019 and 2021 amendments to the Arbitration Act. This helped me appreciate how legislative changes impact arbitration practices. These tasks made me realize how much I enjoyed the international aspect of arbitration and the vibrant, interconnected community it fosters.
My internships at Indian law firms, on the other hand, introduced me to domestic commercial arbitration, maritime arbitration, and corporate law. Working in a domestic setup helped me compare the procedural and substantive differences between institutional and ad-hoc arbitration. This added perspective further cemented my preference for arbitration while also allowing me to see the importance of corporate law in complementing dispute resolution practices.
I didn’t limit myself to arbitration alone. I took up internships in corporate law to ensure I wasn’t narrowing my focus prematurely. For example, during my corporate law internships, I realized I could enjoy transactional work if needed. I believe it’s important to explore different fields before settling on a niche. My corporate law exposure gave me the confidence that if arbitration didn’t work out, I’d have a solid backup plan.
Overall, these experiences taught me the importance of versatility in law and helped me shape a well-rounded understanding of my interests and career aspirations. Exploring different avenues helped me grow, and I would encourage law students to do the same—venture into various fields before specializing. You never know which area will spark your passion.
You graduated with an impressive CGPA of 9.2/10, earning several Gold Medals and subject distinctions. How did you manage to maintain such consistent academic excellence while balancing mooting, internships, and other commitments? What strategies worked best for you during law school, and what advice would you give to young law students eager to make the most of their college experience?
To be honest, when I started law school, I wasn’t entirely sure how academically intense it would be. In the first year, the subjects were relatively light—English, Legal Methods, and similar introductory courses. My approach was straightforward: I’d read up two or three days before the exams, make concise notes, rely on those notes, and move on. This strategy worked for me initially, but things started changing from the second semester when subjects like Constitutional Law entered the picture.
I think the most critical realization for me was understanding the importance of balance in law school. You can’t be someone who only focuses on academics, nor can you solely devote yourself to mooting, debating, or other activities. Unless you’re determined to specialize in a particular niche, like competitive debating, finding that balance is key—at least until your fourth year. Your GPA matters, as it reflects your seriousness and discipline in law school.
For me, the secret was managing my time effectively. I’m not inherently the most disciplined person, but I did focus on planning my days. I’d map out what assignments or tasks needed to be done and allocate my time accordingly. I learned to set realistic daily goals and manage my expectations, which was crucial in balancing academics with activities like mooting and internships.
There were times when moots or other commitments took priority, and at other times, academics had to be the focus. It’s all about understanding your priorities at any given moment and being adaptable. Planning, even loosely, helped me stay on track and ensured I could perform well across the board.
My advice to young law students would be to avoid extremes and aim for a balanced approach. Identify your priorities, plan your days, and set achievable goals. Most importantly, don’t let the pressure overwhelm you—take things step by step and stay consistent.
When did you decide to pursue a master’s degree abroad, and what guided your decision?
I decided to pursue a master’s degree abroad after meeting several people and seniors who had already studied internationally at institutions like Pepperdine University, the University of Chicago, UCLA, and others. Many of these interactions happened through arbitration events, and I realized there wasn’t a specialized school for arbitration in India at the time. While there were scattered options, like the law school in Kolkata offering some focus on the subject, I felt the opportunities were limited and heavily dependent on cracking competitive exams like CLAT for postgraduate studies.
Given my apprehension about relying solely on that route, I decided to explore options abroad. This process involved thorough research, lasting about six months, where I identified my top ten schools based on global rankings, program offerings, and reputation. By the end of my third year, I had narrowed it down to seven schools. However, as rankings and program updates rolled in, my list shifted.
Eventually, I applied to five universities, with my top choices being those offering highly regarded arbitration programs. For instance, the program I chose was ranked as the eighth-best globally and was known for its specialization in maritime and arbitration law. Queen Mary and NYU were also on my list, and while some schools offered general LL.M. programs, I planned to focus on dispute resolution if I attended.
Since I lacked work experience at a law firm, I knew early on that my academics, Statement of Purpose (SOP), and overall profile had to be strong. I spent a considerable amount of time strategizing, ensuring my SOP clearly articulated my story, why I deserved to attend, and what value I could bring to the program.
To prepare, I extensively used resources like YouTube, watching videos of students who had successfully secured admissions at schools like NYU and other top law schools. These videos not only provided insights but also served as a source of motivation. I was methodical throughout the process, practical about the challenges international students face, and determined to build a strong application that would land me in a program I truly wanted to be a part of.
What made you choose NUS over other institutions offering similar programs? Were there specific features of the NUS LLM program that stood out to you? Additionally, which other universities did you apply to, and how did you ultimately narrow down your choices?
I applied to several universities, including Oxford, Queen Mary (QMUL), NYU, and NUS. While Oxford was a dream school for me, I wasn’t accepted, which I somewhat anticipated because I hadn’t prepared as thoroughly as I needed to for their application process. Early on, I received an acceptance from QMUL around February, which served as my backup option.
I was really hoping for offers from NYU and NUS, as those were my top choices. NYU came through with an acceptance, but the financial logistics of studying in the U.S. made it challenging. While studying at an American law school is an incredible opportunity, managing the finances, traveling back home if needed, and other practical considerations made it difficult to pursue.
When NUS’s results came in around May, it became clear that this was the best fit for me. The NUS LL.M. program stood out due to its global focus on arbitration and its rigorous curriculum. Singapore’s geographic positioning also played a role, as it offered excellent exposure to international arbitration and dispute resolution. The program was highly competitive, admitting only a small percentage of recent graduates from India, which highlighted its exclusivity.
Another factor that influenced my decision was the diversity and reputation of NUS’s cohort. I learned that only about 0.8% of recent Indian graduates were accepted, which maintained a high standard of diversity and competitiveness. Upon arriving, I realized how rare it was to be among only three recent graduates in the 2022 cohort, and this added to my confidence in the decision.
Additionally, I weighed the opportunities offered by the UK through QMUL, such as vacation schemes and internships. However, I wasn’t entirely motivated to stay abroad and work immediately after my LL.M. Instead, I wanted to understand arbitration from a global perspective without the immediate pressure of building a career overseas. NUS aligned well with this goal, providing exposure, an excellent academic environment, and a chance to position myself for a global career later on.
Ultimately, while the rejections and decision-making process were stressful, NUS emerged as the perfect choice for me, offering everything I needed to grow academically and professionally in the field of arbitration.
Crafting an impactful Statement of Purpose (SOP) is critical for LL.M. applications and at NUS the SoP has to be of 750 words. How did you approach writing your SOP for NUS, and what key themes did you highlight?
My journey with drafting SOPs started with my application to NYU, as it was the first one I worked on. Based on my research, I learned that U.S. universities are particularly interested in understanding who you are as a person beyond your academic achievements. For NYU, I wrote a very demographically and personally rich SOP, sharing details about where I come from, the struggles I’ve faced, and the journey that has shaped me. I involved my family in the process, asking them to review the drafts and provide feedback from a personal perspective.
When it came to writing the SOP for NUS, my approach was slightly different, as I knew the university valued academic rigor and a demonstrated commitment to one’s field of interest. Unfortunately, I didn’t have the opportunity to connect with any alumni from NUS for specific guidance, but I leveraged insights from seniors who had studied in other universities in the U.S. and UK.
The 750-word limit was a challenge because, at first, even 2,000 words seemed insufficient to capture everything I wanted to convey. But I realized the key was to tailor my SOP to what NUS specifically values. I focused on demonstrating my academic seriousness, given NUS’s reputation for being a highly rigorous and competitive institution.
In my SOP, I emphasized my consistent academic performance and highlighted how I had actively pursued and strengthened my interest in arbitration through various opportunities, such as moots, internships, and research projects. I wanted to convey that I was motivated and prepared to meet the high academic standards of NUS and that my passion for arbitration was backed by a strong foundation of relevant experiences.
The SOP ultimately revolved around a balance between showcasing my academic achievements and my genuine interest in arbitration, which I believe aligned well with NUS’s expectations. My advice to anyone applying to NUS would be to highlight both academic rigor and a clear sense of purpose in the field you’re passionate about, as these are qualities the university deeply values.
Few universities have some sort of cutoff when it comes to CGP. Does NUS have something similar?
Yes, NUS does have a CGPA requirement. When I applied, their website mentioned a minimum cutoff of 8.5. However, when I spoke to their guidance counselor, they clarified that while 8.5 is officially stated, they typically draw the line somewhere between 8 and 9 for international applicants. So yes, NUS is quite academically strict in this regard.
How did you decide whom to approach for your letters of recommendations considering that you didn’t have any work experience?
This was something I researched extensively. While it seemed obvious to approach professors for academic references, I learned through conversations with peers and others who had been through the process that even internships or short clerkships could be a good source for recommendations.
Since my focus was arbitration, I approached my arbitration course coordinator, who also headed the ADR committee at my university. Given his familiarity with my work in arbitration, his recommendation aligned well with my application. Additionally, I sought a recommendation from a professor whose subjects I had excelled in, earning gold medals, and with whom I shared a strong personal connection.
For academic references, it’s essential to have a meaningful relationship with the recommender. Sitting down with them, explaining your goals, and discussing the purpose of the recommendation can make a significant difference. However, if you don’t have a strong personal connection with a professor, building that conversation beforehand can help bridge the gap.
In cases where multiple recommendations are needed, such as for both scholarships and program applications, I sought references from a mix of professors with different expertise. For example, one of my recommenders was the registrar at the time, with whom I had limited interaction, but I approached him and clearly outlined what I hoped the recommendation would highlight.
It’s also crucial to align the recommendation with your application’s focus. For instance, if you’re applying for arbitration, it’s best to have at least one recommender connected to arbitration or related fields. A recommendation from an unrelated subject, such as constitutional law, while personal, may not be as impactful unless it supplements the main recommendation.
The letterhead and the content both matter, so strategize accordingly. If it’s a general application, a recommendation from the head of the department can add weight. Ultimately, the recommendation should reinforce your application’s narrative, so ensure your choices reflect your academic and professional aspirations.
One of your internships was with a study abroad consultancy. Could you share the work you did there and whether that experience helped you in preparing your master’s application? Beyond the internship, did you seek their assistance or that of any other consultants for your application process? What are your thoughts on seeking professional assistance for university applications?
I interned with a study abroad consultancy because their internship post intrigued me—it required applicants to submit their CV along with an interesting fact about themselves. That unique approach caught my attention, and I thought it would be an interesting experience. My primary motivation for interning with them was to understand what these consultancies actually do, how they help applicants, and whether their services would offer me something I couldn’t manage on my own.
Through this internship, I observed that these consultancies indeed offer a lot of guidance and support, especially for those who might not have the time to thoroughly research and prepare their applications. However, for my own application process, I felt I didn’t need their level of assistance. This was largely because I had the time and resources to do my own research, thanks to the extended period of being at home during Covid.
I wasn’t initially planning to apply to many U.S. universities, and my decision to apply to NYU was more driven by curiosity than a concrete plan. That said, I had ample time during the pandemic to delve deeply into understanding the application process on my own. Universities like NUS, for instance, have a fairly straightforward application process, which made it even easier to manage without external help.
For those who don’t have the time or feel unsure about navigating the application process alone, I think consultancies can be a valuable resource. They take their work seriously and can provide tailored guidance, especially for those who figure out their study abroad aspirations later in their academic journey. However, in my case, I was fortunate to have the time and support from my family, particularly my father, which made the process seamless for me.
Ultimately, whether to use a consultancy depends on your personal circumstances. If you’re juggling a packed schedule or feeling overwhelmed, they can certainly lighten the load. But if you have the time and willingness to put in the effort, you can manage the process independently, as I did.
The NUS LL.M. program is known for its rigorous curriculum and global exposure. Could you elaborate on the program, its structure and how it helped you deepen your expertise in dispute resolution?
The NUS LL.M. program is a ten-month course spanning from August to April. It offers a robust mix of academic rigor and practical exposure, providing more than just coursework. Alongside classes, the program features seminars, career guidance sessions, and access to various clubs and centers like the Centre for International Law. LL.M. students also have the opportunity to study with NUS undergraduate law students, which adds a diverse and interactive dimension to the learning experience.
Each semester requires students to complete six courses. For specialized LL.M. tracks, such as mine in dispute resolution, there are mandatory courses in the first semester. These included International Commercial Arbitration, International Dispute Settlement, and Arbitration Law. These foundational courses helped me build a strong base in arbitration and international law.
In addition to the mandatory courses, I had the freedom to explore electives. For instance, I took “Business and Finance for Lawyers” in the first semester, which was aligned with my commerce background. During the semester break, there were short-term courses available, and I opted for the CIAC (Singapore International Arbitration Centre) Institutional Arbitration course. This was particularly insightful as it was taught by professionals from CIAC who provided practical knowledge about arbitration processes, award vetting, and how institutions handle disputes.
The second semester allowed for greater flexibility, so I diversified my coursework. I took classes like Jurisprudence, International Investment Law, and Domestic and International Sale of Goods. By this time, I felt confident about my arbitration knowledge and wanted to explore other areas. One of the highlights was learning from renowned professors whose perspectives were both academic and practical.
What stood out to me was the diversity of courses offered at NUS, such as Fashion Law and even a legal analysis of the Bible. The breadth of options allowed me to create a personalized learning experience that went beyond dispute resolution and enriched my overall understanding of law.
The interactive environment, exposure to international perspectives, and the ability to learn from both faculty and peers with different legal systems were key factors that made the program impactful. It truly felt like I was creating a “mini basket” of courses tailored to my academic and professional goals.
Singapore offers only a one-year post-study work permit for international students. How did you navigate this challenge, and what strategies did you employ to maximize your chances of integrating into the Singaporean legal system?
The one-year post-study work permit in Singapore largely depends on the sponsorship or endorsement you receive from the firms you work with. For instance, if a firm decides to retain you, they may provide sponsorship for an employment pass or endorse your application for a work permit. However, the decision on such permits ultimately rests with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) and the policies in place at that time.
Since international students, especially those who are not Singapore-qualified, typically do not enter as associates, the roles available might be as interns, long-term interns, paralegals, or legal executives. These roles often dictate the type of permit you can apply for. Firms may not always sponsor a permit but can endorse your application, which increases your chances of staying back.
However, it’s important to note that Singapore’s legal system prioritizes employing its own citizens and permanent residents. This makes it challenging for international graduates to secure positions, especially with frequent changes in immigration and hiring policies. For instance, post-COVID, there was a noticeable resistance toward international students staying on in Singapore, making it even more essential to stay updated on policy changes and market demands.
For those serious about working in Singapore, dual qualification, such as obtaining a UK legal qualification, can significantly enhance your chances. Being dual-qualified makes it easier to meet the requirements of the Singapore legal market. Another option is to explore vacation schemes or internships with Singapore-based firms, which can serve as a stepping stone.
Networking and researching the market are critical. Reaching out to individuals already working in Singapore can help you understand what firms are looking for and how your qualifications align with their needs. For example, if a firm has an India desk, you could position yourself as someone uniquely qualified to handle cross-border matters. In cases where sponsorship isn’t feasible, some small law firms may allow you to work remotely from India while being affiliated with them and earning in Singapore dollars.
Ultimately, navigating this challenge requires careful planning, staying updated on policies, and exploring creative solutions such as remote affiliations or leveraging dual qualifications. Understanding the specific needs of Singaporean firms and aligning your skills to meet those needs is key to successfully integrating into the market.
Your publications span a wide range of topics, from arbitration to space tourism and feminism. How are you able to write about socially relevant issues and core legal topics at the same time!
Feminism as a topic came very naturally to me because of my involvement in the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) at my university. Being part of that environment meant engaging in meaningful discussions around gender issues, social justice, and equality. At its core, feminism is a universal cause aligned with larger global goals, so writing about it felt instinctive and relevant.
Space tourism, on the other hand, was something that sparked my curiosity when my university was planning a conference on the topic. While helping with the preparation, I started reading about space tourism, its implications, and issues like space pollution. I found it fascinating and thought it was an exciting subject to explore further. That’s when I decided to write about it.
When it comes to choosing topics to write about, I believe the key is genuine interest. I always ask myself, Do I really want to write about this? Am I passionate enough about this subject to spend my time researching it and crafting something that’s worth someone else’s time? Starting from that point ensures that I’m invested in the process, and the end result is meaningful.
My advice to anyone looking to write is to begin with something that they find intriguing and would want to read themselves. Start with the basics, and as you progress, you’ll naturally refine your work to resonate with a broader audience. Over time, what you write will start to reach more people, from 20 readers to hundreds or even thousands.
For me, writing has not only been a way to explore my interests but also an asset in my academic journey. Universities like Oxford, for example, place significant value on research and publications. Even writing shorter posts or analyses on platforms like LinkedIn can make a difference. Sharing your thoughts consistently and authentically helps build credibility and demonstrates your engagement with diverse topics.
Besides the DC Very Young Arbitration Practitioners, you are a young member of various other groups like MCIA, YIAG, ICCA. What are the benefits of being a member of such groups, and how can one capitalize on these memberships? What has your experience been like so far?
Becoming a member of these groups is relatively simple. Most require you to submit a small statement of interest or your CV, demonstrating your involvement or aspirations in arbitration or the legal field. The application process isn’t particularly challenging, and once accepted, the benefits can be substantial.
One of the primary advantages is access to mentorship programs. One-on-one mentorship is invaluable for anyone trying to build a niche in a specialized field like arbitration. Through these groups, I’ve connected with professionals who have already established themselves and who offer practical insights, including the less glamorous realities of the profession. This guidance has been instrumental in shaping my career direction.
Additionally, these memberships provide opportunities to attend events—many of which are either free or offered at discounted rates for young members. Even if you can’t attend an event, these groups often circulate concise summaries, keeping you updated on the latest developments and trends in the field. This is particularly useful for staying connected to the global arbitration community.
My experience with these groups has been incredibly enriching. For instance, through YIAG and similar organizations, I’ve participated in diversity and inclusion initiatives and attended programs focused on women in arbitration. With ICCA, I’ve been able to engage in discussions on critical topics, while organizations like Arbitral Women have provided financial support, such as sponsoring our moot court participation.
These memberships strengthen your personal brand within the community. They signal your commitment to the field and keep you in the loop about important events, opportunities, and industry trends. They also help you build a robust network, which is essential in any legal field.
Importantly, these groups aren’t limited to arbitration. For those in other legal fields—like environmental law, corporate law, or competition law—there are equivalent organizations designed to foster community building, networking, and continuous learning. Joining such groups is more than just a résumé addition; it’s a way to immerse yourself in your chosen field, meet like-minded individuals, and stay ahead of the curve.
You are currently working as an Associate at Svarniti Law Offices. Could you tell us about your role and responsibilities there, and how your experiences have influenced the way you approach work?
Currently, I have a diverse role at Svarniti Law Offices, as it’s a boutique law firm that allows me to explore a mix of everything. I’ve been working here for over a year, completing my first year in the first week of November. The experience has been incredible. My bosses have a strong background in bilateral investment treaty arbitrations from their previous firm, and their expertise was a major reason I wanted to join. Their knowledge and experience in arbitration, particularly investment arbitration, align perfectly with my own interests and aspirations in this field.
At Svarniti, I’m actively involved in arbitration and contentious work, which keeps me engaged and on my toes. Alongside arbitration, I handle a variety of commercial litigation matters, including insolvency (IBC) and competition law cases. This exposure has been particularly enlightening, as I didn’t initially realize how closely commercial litigation ties into broader commercial law practices.
My experiences at NUS have significantly shaped how I approach my work. The rigorous training and emphasis on networking I gained there taught me the importance of building connections and leveraging them for opportunities. This skill has helped me effectively present myself and my capabilities to my seniors. I’ve noticed that when certain types of cases arise, my bosses are confident in assigning them to me because of the specific skills and knowledge I’ve demonstrated.
The education and exposure I gained at NUS refined my understanding of law and helped me bring a unique perspective to my role at Svarniti. It’s not just about applying what I’ve learned academically but also about presenting my ideas in a way that makes an impression. The cultural and professional development I experienced at NUS has added a distinctive flair to my approach, enabling me to stand out as an associate. It has truly shaped how I navigate and contribute to the dynamic environment at Svarniti.
As the first alumna of DSNLU to attend NUS, you are a trailblazer in your own right. How do you personally define success in your career, and what are the long-term goals that drive you forward?
Honestly, I’m still figuring out how to define success in my career. For me, success has always been tied to the idea of being content, but as a lawyer, true contentment can feel elusive—you never have enough cases, you’re always striving for more. However, I think success, for me, would be about building meaningful and enduring connections. If, 20 years from now, I can reach out to people I worked with at my first firm, connect with my mentors, and still have those relationships intact and fulfilling, that would mean success to me. It’s about creating a network that is wholesome and supportive, where people recognize and respect the value you bring.
The legal fraternity is very community-driven, and to make a name for yourself within this community, while also giving credit to those who helped you along the way, is something I deeply value. If I can reach a point where I can rely on these connections and take each day as it comes without excessive worry about the future, that would truly be a sigh of relief for me—a personal definition of success.
As for long-term goals, they do evolve over time, but I see myself working in a well-established law firm. I genuinely enjoy the corporate structure and the challenges it presents, and I aim to continue growing and contributing in that environment. Building a career that is both impactful and aligned with my passion for law is something I look forward to achieving.
Please share some networking tips. How to connect with people so as to establish long term connections with them?
The most important thing when networking is to be yourself. I’ll admit, I used to have a lot of apprehensions about reaching out to people. Cold emails and LinkedIn messages felt so impersonal at first, and I was nervous about whether they’d even respond. But over time, I realized that taking that leap of faith is crucial. Even if only one out of a hundred emails or messages works out, that one connection can make all the difference.
Start by sending that first message or email without overthinking. Introduce yourself, share why you’re reaching out, and don’t hesitate to ask for a quick chat or a coffee meeting. During my time at NUS, I reached out to partners at law firms and was surprised at how open many of them were to having a conversation, whether over Zoom or in person. It showed me that a lot of people, especially those well-established in the field, genuinely want to help and give back.
That said, it’s crucial to approach these conversations with authenticity. Don’t just message someone because you want a job or recommendation. Instead, express genuine interest in their journey—what they’ve accomplished, what inspired you about them, or something specific you admire about their work. Building a personal connection is key.
For instance, I once reached out to a partner at a Singapore firm, and our initial conversation was just about our mutual love for The Office. It was such a casual yet memorable interaction that later led to an internship opportunity. The personal connection made all the difference, and I believe it left a lasting impression.
Also, stay in touch with your seniors and juniors. Networking isn’t just about reaching out to people above you—it’s about building relationships across all levels. Be friendly, approachable, and open.
Ultimately, the key to successful networking is persistence and sincerity. Even if several messages go unanswered, don’t lose hope. Keep the conversations authentic and focus on building meaningful relationships rather than just transactional ones. And most importantly, make sure they remember you—whether it’s through a shared interest, a thoughtful conversation, or the impression you leave.
Finally, what advice would you give to students who are considering pursuing their LLM abroad? Any advice you wish you had received before starting?
One piece of advice I wish I had received before starting my LLM is to consider gaining a few years of work experience before applying. Practical exposure to how law operates in your country can significantly enhance your understanding of classroom discussions and add depth to your contributions. During my program, I saw my peers draw from their real-world experiences, especially in arbitration, to discuss how they approached specific challenges and how different jurisdictions tackled similar issues. These insights were incredibly valuable and something I felt I missed out on as I went straight into my LLM after graduation.
However, having no work experience wasn’t entirely a drawback. I found it easier to adapt to the academic rigor, like writing exams or impressing professors, because I was fresh out of law school. But for those aiming to apply to universities like Columbia or Yale, gaining at least two years of work experience is often a prerequisite. So, if you’re targeting such institutions, that’s something to consider.
My advice for students would be not to rush the process or blindly apply to a large number of universities. Instead, dedicate time to researching programs that align with your interests and goals. Tailor your applications carefully and focus on quality over quantity. Understand the unique attributes of the university and its program—what kind of students they’re looking for, the image they’re trying to build—and ensure your application reflects that.
Another important tip is to put yourself in the shoes of an admissions officer when reviewing your application. Ask yourself: Would I admit this candidate? Craft your statement of purpose and application materials to make a compelling case for why you’re a perfect fit for the program.
Ultimately, an LLM is a significant investment of time and resources, so make sure you choose a program that adds genuine value to your career aspirations. With thorough research and strategic applications, you’ll be in a much stronger position to make the most of your LLM journey.
(This transcript is based on the original interview’s audio. It is a refined version and may contain minor errors, omissions, or variations from the verbatim recording. For the guest’s exact inputs and sentiments, please refer to the podcast episode.)
